Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382123›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2025

The dual impact of peer mentor programs on career maturity and career decision-making self-efficacy of nursing students during the transition period: a mixed-methods study.

Cheng Yao, Zaihao Wu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cheng YaoFaculty of Education, Nakhon Phanom University, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand. slevenyaocheng@163.com.
Zaihao WuSchool of Music and Dance, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition period is a critical phase that affects career maturity and the development of professional identity. Although previous studies have suggested that peer mentoring may serve as a supportive strategy, empirical evidence on its effectiveness remains limited. This study aims to examine the effects of structured peer mentor programs on nursing students' career maturity and career decision-making self-efficacy.

methodsThis study adopted a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design. A total of 78 final-year undergraduate nursing students were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A completed a traditional internship before serving as peer counselors. Group B received peer guidance before undertaking an independent internship. Quantitative data were collected at three time points: pretest, posttest, and follow-up. The Career Maturity Inventory and the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale were used to assess changes over time. Repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the intervention effects. In addition, qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to explore students' subjective experiences.

resultsPeer mentor programs had positive effects on both career maturity and career decision-making self-efficacy at different stages. Group A showed a statistically significant increase in scores during the mentoring phase, indicating that guiding others contributed to role reflection and experience integration. Group B demonstrated a notable improvement in confidence and clearer career direction after receiving guidance. Interview findings revealed improvements in emotional support, professional identity, and sense of responsibility. Both peer counselors and peer trainees reported positive developmental experiences.

conclusionPeer mentor programs support both psychological and professional growth for nursing students during the transition period. Equal interaction and role transformation help students enhance their professional identity and competencies, whether through providing or receiving support. It is recommended to integrate structured peer support into nursing internship programs.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMentoringMentorsPeer GroupSelf EfficacyStudents, NursingAdultDecision MakingEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCareer Decision-Making Self-Efficacy (CDMSE)Career maturity (CM)Nursing studentsPeer mentor program (PMP)Transition period

Identifiers

PMID41382123
PMCPMC12696891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.