ArticleBMC medical education2025
Family planning education in midwifery and nursing: experiences, problems and suggestions.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily planning (FP) is a key component of individual and societal well-being. Raising awareness and ensuring access to FP methods are essential to improving reproductive health outcomes. Preparing future health professionals with adequate knowledge and skills in FP counselling is therefore a priority. This study aimed to explore the opinions of midwifery and nursing students regarding the FP counselling training they received during their undergraduate education and to evaluate their competencies in this area.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative research design aimed at obtaining in-depth information. Criterion sampling was used to recruit participants. Sixteen students (8 midwifery, 8 nursing) who had received FP education participated in one-on-one, in-depth interviews guided by a semi-structured form. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 24 through content analysis and thematic coding.
resultsStudents' perspectives were grouped under five themes: (1) general views on family planning, (2) opinions on the FP training received, (3) FP counselling experiences, (4) considerations in FP counselling, and (5) self-efficacy in FP counselling. While students acknowledged the importance of FP and considered the training beneficial, limitations included short duration, lack of practical experience, and insufficient content. Most students reported low confidence in FP counselling, particularly nursing students who had fewer opportunities for hands-on practice.
conclusionThe findings highlight the need to strengthen FP education in midwifery and nursing curricula. Strategies such as extending course duration, incorporating practical applications, simulations, and technology-supported training can improve students' self-efficacy and competence in FP counselling. Enhancing training in this area will contribute to patient-centered care and improved population health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.