ArticleBMC health services research2025
A maturity matrix and actionable tool for implementing best practices within the radiography support workforce: a mixed methods synthesis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadiology is a multidisciplinary specialty, combining the medical specialism of radiologists with the clinical expertise of diagnostic radiographers. Radiographers are skilled in performing imaging procedures such as X-Rays, ultrasound and computed tomography scans to diagnose and monitor conditions within a wide range of patient pathways, and they are assisted by support workers who enable service delivery by providing patient facing and ancillary activities. Imaging service demands in the United Kingdom continue to outpace growth in the radiographer workforce, and there is an urgent need to explore the potential for developing the capability and capacity of the imaging support workforce. A multi-centre mixed methods study investigated the determinants for the utilisation of the radiography support workforce in England, presenting the findings in a maturity matrix. A maturity matrix is an actionable tool which aims to facilitate practice improvements, presented as a series of distinct, iterative steps that showcase the desired developmental path towards an effective service.
methodsThe mixed methods study employed an explanatory sequential, multi-stage advanced framework design, involving six consecutive workstreams. The final workstream synthesised and integrated findings from the previous workstreams to identify the key factors that contribute to best practices in imaging support workforce deployment. Documentation of critical determinants and articulation of quality indicators were modelled into a maturity matrix to be used by imaging managers to review and plan the development of their support workforce.
resultsThe Imaging Support Workforce Maturity Matrix is constructed as a means of tackling workforce improvements and tracking progress over time at service level. Fifteen critical determinants within three themed categories (evidence-based workforce planning; deployment; development and progression) were embedded within the matrix. Each determinant is presented for self-assessment against four levels of service maturity (Emerging, Developing, Maturing, and Thriving). These support assessment and action-planning towards the goal of fully developing the role and progression route for the support workforce.
conclusionThe Imaging Support Workforce Maturity Matrix is presented. The actionable tool was reviewed with service managers in a first stage of validation and further research will be undertaken to implement appropriately across other allied health professions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.