ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2025
Twin pairs discordant for incident coronary artery disease reveal epigenetic and transcriptomic differences by gene region.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading causes of mortality globally, of which coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most frequent. Several epigenomics and transcriptomics studies of CAD have been conducted, however, only a few studies have utilized the statically powerful discordant twin pair design, which reduces the confounding introduced by genetics. Finally, no study has investigated the link between the DNA methylation position and gene expression levels. The present study aims at filling this knowledge gap, to present novel biomarkers of CAD. We investigated 44 Danish twin pairs that were discordant for incident CAD, for whom, both genome-wide DNA methylation (CpG) and gene expression (probe) data were available. We identified CpGs and probes, which were more different within the twin pairs than expected by change, and investigated these by Cox regression analysis. CpGs and probes belonging to the same gene were divided into groups based on their directions of effect, and these genes were investigated by gene set enrichment and interaction network analyses. Overall, we found that CAD co-twins showed DNA methylation patterns leading to up-regulated gene expression; especially with demethylation of promoters and methylation of gene bodies, compared to their non-CAD co-twin. Generally, we found that the largest biological group of up-regulated pathways related to immune-inflammation processes, whereas down-regulated pathways related to muscle system biology, among others. Hence, the present study uncovers a specific pattern between DNA methylation position and gene expression levels relating to CAD, pointing to a need for additional studies. However, such multi-omics designs are surprisingly rare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.