ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Temporal trends and outcomes of long coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for long chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are limited. We sought to identify temporal trends in PCI for long CTOs. We studied patients undergoing CTO-PCI between January 2015 and December 2022. Long CTO was defined as an occlusion length of ≥ 20 mm. The study population consisted of 10,302 patients, of whom 5,627 (54.6%) had a long CTO. Of these, 1,937 CTOs (34.4%) underwent primary retrograde approach and 1,486 CTOs (26.4%) underwent reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking (CART). Reverse CART had a higher technical success rate than retrograde wiring and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided wiring after antegrade wiring (94.7%, 91.0%, and 81.6%, respectively), a longer guidewire crossing time (124, 92, and 85 min, respectively), and a higher incidence of coronary perforation (8.5%, 4.9%, and 6.3%, respectively) (P < 0.01 for all). For long CTOs with good distal landing without side branches, the use of primary retrograde approach and reverse CART decreased over time from 39.9% to 27.3% and from 36.3% to 20.1%, respectively, whereas the use of antegrade wiring and IVUS-guided wiring after antegrade wiring increased from 46.6% to 58.7% and from 1.0% to 8.7%, respectively (P for trend < 0.01 for all). In PCI for long CTOs, reverse CART was the most commonly used re-entry technique. For long CTOs with good distal landing without side branches, the use of primary retrograde approach and reverse CART decreased, whereas the use of antegrade wiring and IVUS-guided wiring after antegrade wiring increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41381962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.