Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381952›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Women and cardiovascular disease: Why is a gender-sensitive approach essential?]

Viyan Sido, Sabine Oertelt-Prigione

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Viyan SidoImmanuel Klinikum Bernau, Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Universitätsklinikum der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Gesundheitswissenschaftliche Fakultät Brandenburg, Bernau, Deutschland. viyan.sido@gmx.de.
Sabine Oertelt-PrigioneAG Geschlechtersensible Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät OWL, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in women, yet research, diagnostics, and treatment strategies continue to be shaped predominantly by male-centered evidence. This results in delayed diagnoses, misinterpretation of atypical symptoms, and suboptimal therapeutic decisions. A gender-sensitive approach demonstrates that both biological factors ("sex") and psychosocial or structural determinants ("gender") substantially influence risk profiles, symptom presentation, care pathways, and clinical outcomes in women. They present with cardiovascular disease at an older age, accumulate more comorbidities, experience longer pre-hospital delays, and receive fewer invasive diagnostic and interventional procedures. Epidemiological data from Europe and the United States show that despite declining mortality rates, women continue to experience excess mortality and consistent underdiagnosis, particularly in acute care and rehabilitation. This article summarizes current evidence on epidemiology, risk factors, symptomatology, diagnostics, and treatment, and shows that a gender-sensitive approach must be systematically implemented in research, guidelines, and clinical practice to close existing care gaps and sustainably improve cardiovascular health in women.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesWomen's HealthFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsBiological sex differencesCardiovascular diseases/psychosocial factorsCardiovascular diseases/risk factorsGender-sensitive careMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.