Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381933›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2026

Aperiodic Brain Activity Modulates Corticospinal Excitability.

Jingna Jin, Xin Wang, Xinyu Zhao, He Wang, Ying Li, Zhipeng Liu, Tao Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingna JinState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1714-0688
Xin WangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.
Xinyu ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.
He WangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-0574
Ying LiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-7962
Zhipeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-4402
Tao YinState Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300192, China. bme500@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-6027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) synchronizes with instantaneous power and is a novel time-precise neuroregulation approach. The key to this approach is using instantaneous power to reliably estimate specific cortical excitability. However, the specific influence of instantaneous power, particularly aperiodic brain activity, on corticospinal excitability is not fully understood. In our study, single-pulse TMS stimulated the primary motor cortex at 110% resting motor threshold (RMT) and 120% RMT, and the electroencephalography and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded simultaneously. We conducted a five-part analysis, including total power, periodic power, aperiodic power, the aperiodic exponent, and offset, to evaluate the power dependence of corticospinal excitability. We found that the higher the alpha and beta power were, the greater the MEP amplitudes were. The aperiodic component plays a more critical role than the periodic component. Furthermore, corticospinal output was less affected by power at 120% RMT than at 110% RMT. Our findings highlight that the aperiodic component is associated with cortical excitability and may be a valuable parameter for optimizing brain-state-dependent TMS approaches.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexPyramidal TractsAdultElectroencephalographyElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultAperiodic powerCorticospinal excitabilityElectroencephalographyMotor-evoked potentialPeriodic powerResting motor thresholdTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41381933
PMCPMC13388619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.