ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2026
Aperiodic Brain Activity Modulates Corticospinal Excitability.
Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intra- and Inter-Session Reliability of Average- and Trial-Level Motor Evoked Potential Amplitudes.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) synchronizes with instantaneous power and is a novel time-precise neuroregulation approach. The key to this approach is using instantaneous power to reliably estimate specific cortical excitability. However, the specific influence of instantaneous power, particularly aperiodic brain activity, on corticospinal excitability is not fully understood. In our study, single-pulse TMS stimulated the primary motor cortex at 110% resting motor threshold (RMT) and 120% RMT, and the electroencephalography and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded simultaneously. We conducted a five-part analysis, including total power, periodic power, aperiodic power, the aperiodic exponent, and offset, to evaluate the power dependence of corticospinal excitability. We found that the higher the alpha and beta power were, the greater the MEP amplitudes were. The aperiodic component plays a more critical role than the periodic component. Furthermore, corticospinal output was less affected by power at 120% RMT than at 110% RMT. Our findings highlight that the aperiodic component is associated with cortical excitability and may be a valuable parameter for optimizing brain-state-dependent TMS approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.