Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381926›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

An Interpretable Hybrid AI Model for Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Image Classification.

Manjula Kalita, Lipi B Mahanta, Anup Kumar Das, Dwipen Laskar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manjula KalitaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Girijananda Chowdhury University, Guwahati, India.
Lipi B MahantaMathematical and Computational Sciences Division, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology (IASST), Guwahati, India. lbmahanta@iasst.gov.in.
Anup Kumar DasArya Wellness Centre, Guwahati, India.
Dwipen LaskarDepartment of Computer Science, Gauhati University, Guwahati, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and mammography are both used to diagnose breast lesions, FNAC is generally more accurate than mammograms for predicting breast cancer. It is also gaining popularity as an early detection tool due to its rapid and straightforward procedure, cost-effectiveness, and minimal risk of complications. Deep learning enhances breast cancer detection by extracting crucial features, yielding highly accurate results compared to conventional techniques. Classical machine learning is less time-intensive and requires fewer parameter adjustments. This work is presented as a proof-of-concept study on FNAC images obtained from two centers. It explores eighteen hybrid architectures that are developed and evaluated, combining the strength of deep learning techniques- Inception-V3, MobileNet-V2, and DenseNet-121 for feature extraction, with three machine learning classifiers (Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and k-Nearest Neighbours) for binary classification of fine needle aspiration cytology images of the breast. Our study is based on an indigenously collected dataset of 427 images (152 benign and 275 malignant), which was later expanded through augmentation to 2,866 images (1216 benign and 1,650 malignant). The hybrid model, which combines feature extraction from MobileNet-V2 and DenseNet-121 in a concatenated architecture, achieves the highest internal test accuracy of 98.26% when paired with an SVM classifier. It also achieves the best-known sensitivity (97.95%) and specificity (98.48%). The explainability model, which utilizes Grad-CAM, achieved 95% positive clinical validation by expert pathologists, underscoring the model's trustworthiness and interpretability-critical for clinical adoption and decision-making support. The proposed hybrid model, with its impressive metrics and validation rate, underscores the model's ability to provide clear, interpretable insights that support clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDecision TreesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMammographySupport Vector MachineBreast cancer detectionDeep learningExplainable AIFine needle aspiration cytologyHybrid architecture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.