Observational studyActa neurochirurgica2025
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and deep learning-based synthetic computed tomography for calcified intradural tumors - importance of domain-specific training and validation of synthetic imaging methods for clinical application.
Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based synthetic CT for the assessment of spinal structural lesions in axial spondyloarthritis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFor intradural spinal tumors, information on the degree of calcification is helpful to plan the surgery. Novel deep-learning algorithms allow to generate synthetic computed tomography (CT) images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational cohort study, including n = 105 patients with spinal pathologies between 07/2022 - 09/2023, to validate the accuracy of BoneMRI (MRIGuidance BV©, Utrecht, the Netherlands). Patients underwent both conventional CT and MRI; synthetic CT images were generated from MRI source data with artificial intelligence (AI). For the scope of this post-hoc analysis, only patients with intradural tumors were selected.
resultsFive patients with intradural tumors of the spine were included (mean age 67.8 years; 4 (80%) female). The tumors were visible on 5/5 conventional CT images (100%), on average 19.6 × 11.6 mm in size and 4/5 (80%) were densely calcified (mean Hounsfield units (HU) 463.6). Although well-visible on the T1w/T2w/BoneMRI source data, none of the tumors showed up (0%) on synthetic CT. Visible tumor dimensions were 0 mm in both axial (p < 0.001) and sagittal planes (p = 0.017), with an average density of 20.9 HUs (p = 0.034).
conclusionsBoneMRI generated synthetic CT is a promising, radiation-free alternative to conventional CT. Intradural tumors - even those with dense calcifications - were not visualized by synthetic CT images, highlighting that this novel technology is currently not able to capture lesions outside its main scope. Our analysis demonstrates powerfully that synthetic imaging must be cautiously applied to populations for which it was developed and validated, and that any extrapolation can be clinically misleading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.