ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025
An in-depth look at shallow-water walking: the mechanical determinants of the energy metabolic cost of shallow water walking in humans.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human locomotion in water involves unique forces (buoyancy, drag) influencing metabolic cost. However, a validated model integrating these forces to predict the cost of transport (COT) during shallow water walking (SWW) is lacking, and energetic optimization strategies remain unclear compared to terrestrial gaits. We measured the COT in nine healthy men during SWW across four immersion depths (knee to xiphoid) and four walking speeds (0.2-0.8 m/s). We developed and validated a physiomechanical model based on the mechanical work done against buoyancy-affected body weight and hydrodynamic drag. Using this model, we compared the energetics of SWW with swimming and dry land walking (including hypogravity conditions) and analyzed self-selected walking speeds. The minimum COT occurred at hip immersion depth (0.2 m/s), rather than at intermediate speeds, with the J-shaped relationship observed only at knee immersion depth. Metabolic power, in contrast, remained relatively constant during self-selected walking across immersion depths. An immersion depth threshold near the center of mass emerged, above which swimming becomes more economical than SWW. Our physiomechanical model accurately predicted the measured COT. The interplay between buoyancy and drag dictates SWW energetics, shifting optimization away from intermediate speeds common on dry land. From a physiological perspective, these findings quantify the energetic consequences of human locomotor adaptation to the unique mechanical challenges posed by aquatic environments. Furthermore, identifying an immersion depth threshold influencing the economical choice between walking and swimming provides new insights into human aquatic locomotor adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.