ArticlePediatric research2026
Is this neonate feeling pain? Leveraging clinical knowledge towards high-precision Large Language Model-based neonatal pain assessment.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the face: advancing multimodal AI for neonatal pain assessment.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonates in intensive care undergo an average of 13 painful procedures daily, with untreated pain linked to structural brain alterations and long-term cognitive and behavioral impairments. Current pain assessment relies on subjective evaluation scales that vary according to infant characteristics, procedure type, and evaluator background, highlighting the need for more objective assessment methods.
methodsWe leverage a Vision-Language Model (VLM) for neonatal Automatic Pain Assessment (APA) and implemented novel prompt categories based on two approaches: (1) encouraging the model to retrieve clinical knowledge from its pretraining, and (2) providing information about clinically relevant facial features.
resultsWhen leveraging latent clinical knowledge, the model achieved a balance of precision (82.3%) and recall (73.2%). When assessing clinically relevant facial features, it reached perfect precision (100%) with lower recall (40.1%).
conclusionThis first application of VLMs for neonatal APA demonstrates superior performance compared to previous deep learning approaches. The model effectively retrieves latent clinical knowledge and performs best when provided with clinical context. When instructed with specific criteria and facial features, it achieved high precision with significantly reduced withdrawal rates compared to baseline prompts, highlighting the feasibility of this novel approach as a real-world evaluation of state-of-the-art technology through all its steps of development. IMPACT: This study pioneers the application of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for Automatic Pain Assessment in neonates, offering a novel alternative to traditional deep learning approaches. We demonstrate that carefully designed prompts can leverage a model's latent clinical knowledge or guide it to assess specific facial features, without requiring fine-tuning. Our approach achieves perfect precision (100%) when assessing clinically relevant facial features, surpassing previous deep learning methods. This work opens new research directions for neonatal pain assessment using instruction-based AI systems that can incorporate clinical expertise through natural language prompts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41381876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.