ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive value of internal jugular vein combining with inferior vena cava diameters by ultrasound in central venous pressure of ICU patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venous congestion in critical care: combining VExUS, lung ultrasound, and echocardiography.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is valuable for guiding fluid management in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, direct measurement via an intravenous catheter is invasive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Noninvasive ultrasound vessel measurements, such as internal jugular vein (IJV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index, offer alternatives but are affected by respiratory and anatomical factors. Static vessel diameters may provide a simpler, more reliable method, yet few studies have assessed their combined predictive value for estimating CVP. Critically ill, spontaneously breathing ICU patients received central venous pressure monitoring and ultrasound assessment of the transverse and anteroposterior diameter(TD and APD)of the IJV and CCA, along with IVC diameter (IVCD). The dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set. Correlations between each vessel diameter and CVP were analyzed using linear regression. A multivariable linear regression model was then developed to predict CVP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of the model to identify patients with low CVP (< 8 mmHg). A total of 181 patients were enrolled. IJV-APD (r = 0.57), CCA-APD (r = 0.49), IVCD (r = 0.58) showed significant linear positive correlations with CVP. Using these correlative variables from univariate linear analysis, both IJV-APD (β = 1.789, p < 0.05) and ICVD (β = 1.334, p < 0.05) effectively predict the actual CVP values by multivariable linear regression. A predictive model combining IJV-APD and IVCD measurements accurately identified patients with CVP < 8 mmHg, with high AUC both in the training set (AUC = 0.807) and validating set (AUC = 0.749). We found that IJV-APD, CCA-APD and ICVD were associated with the level of CVP in critically ill patients. The predictive model incorporating IJV-APD and IVCD can effectively identify patients with low CVP (< 8 mmHg) in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.