SynthesisScientific reports2025
Developing a conceptual framework for adolescent disaster resilience education in Iran.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of public education research, there exists a critical need to assess readiness and investigate behavioral changes in the context of disasters through the lens of behavior change theories aimed at modeling disaster preparedness. Despite numerous paradoxes that arise between structural factors and associated risks, the behavioral responses of adolescents in reaction to disasters remain significantly underexplored. The current study employed a mixed-methods approach and an "all-hazards" framework. The goal was to develop a conceptual model for teaching teenagers to be more resilient in the face of disasters, thereby enhancing social resilience in Iran. The present study used a mixed-method approach in four stages. The first stage was carried out by a systematic review of articles published between August 18, 2001, and August 31, 2024. The second stage involved semi-structured in-depth interviews with 21 experts and 35 adolescents chosen through purposeful sampling. In the third stage, a Delphi questionnaire was designed to measure the components and reach expert agreement, and the level of importance of each extracted factor was evaluated with the participation of 20 professors and experts in disaster management. Finally, by holding a panel of experts according to the results of the previous three stages, the model of adolescent disaster resilience education was designed to improve social resilience in Iran. The results of the present study proposed a model of adolescents' disaster resilience education to improve social resilience, which consists of four main parts, including governance perspectives, need-based education, social participation, and scope of influence. Identifying the influential factors and components in adolescent disaster resilience education and measuring the agreement of experts about the components by determining the priority and importance of each component in developing disaster education programs can be very effective in improving the resilience of adolescents against disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.