ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-view text classification through integrated RNN autoencoder learning of word, sentence, emotion and paragraph representations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Text classification performance can be constrained by single-view approaches that process documents through a single representational lens and struggle to capture the multi-dimensional nature of textual information. We propose FMV-RNN-AE (Feature integration Multi-View RNN Autoencoder), an end-to-end framework that systematically integrates four complementary textual views-word-level embeddings, sentence-level representations, emotion-based features, and paragraph-level semantics. FMV-RNN-AE employs standard RNN autoencoders to learn compressed view-specific representations, followed by a learnable fusion module and joint optimization for classification, focusing on the principled integration of these components rather than introducing a fundamentally new architecture. Comprehensive evaluation across seven benchmark datasets shows consistent improvements of 4.7% compared to strong single-view approaches and 2.2-4.0% over existing multi-view methods, with particularly strong performance on sentiment-oriented tasks (93.5% accuracy on Hate Speech, 92.7% on IMDb). Compared with BERT, FMV-RNN-AE achieves comparable average accuracy while using 7.2× fewer parameters and 50% less memory, at the cost of approximately 4× higher inference latency due to sequential multi-view processing. Thus, the framework is best interpreted as a memory-efficient, task-sensitive alternative suited to latency-tolerant, batch or offline scenarios rather than real-time applications. These results highlight the potential of carefully designed multi-view autoencoder integration for improving text classification robustness across diverse domains under constrained memory budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.