ArticleScientific reports2025
A study on an enhanced method for joint extraction of control intent and navigation information for smart city airport operations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the critical challenge of bidirectional dependency modeling in air traffic control (ATC) communications - a gap identified in state-of-the-art joint extraction models like CII - this study proposes CII-BERT, an enhanced framework integrating BERT's contextual representation with task-specific DNN layers. Motivated by the need to reduce aviation risks caused by instruction misinterpretation, we define "flight safety" through two quantifiable metrics: conflict probability reduction and instruction error rate. Our approach uniquely employs continuous pre-training with domain-adapted augmentation strategies (synonym substitution and random block exchange), enabling robust learning of ATC-specific syntax and terminologies. Evaluated on a diverse control directive dataset (6,000 + samples across 7 operational scenarios), CII-BERT achieves 99.44% intent recognition accuracy and 99.23% information extraction accuracy - outperforming CII by 1.71 and 1.58%, respectively. Crucially, error analysis confirms a 37% reduction in high-risk edge cases (e.g., ambiguous altitude commands) compared to baseline models. This demonstrates CII-BERT's potential to enhance smart airport operations not only in safety but also in controller workload optimization and runway efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.