ArticleScientific reports2025
Structure-based identification of compounds with potential as selective BLT1 antagonists.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational and Molecular Dynamics Insights into the Antithrombotic Mechanism of Triterpenes Derived fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pro-inflammatory molecule leukotriene B4 binds to the leukotriene B4 receptors 1 and 2 (BLT1 and BLT2). Although BLT1 has potential as a target for treating inflammatory diseases, no selective BLT1 antagonist has been marketed to date. Most of the developed compounds bind to both BLT receptors, which are now considered to have some opposite functions. Our goal was to identify potential selective antagonists of BLT1 that could be advanced in future studies for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. We performed a robust virtual screening process using a library of bioactive compounds. The library was screened against BLT1 first, and the top hits were then screened against BLT2. The top eight candidates were selected based on several criteria for further studies, starting with predictions of various physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity properties. Next, each selected compound underwent a 500 ns molecular dynamics simulation to evaluate ligand-protein complex stability and the interaction profile. Finally, the compounds were ranked based on predicted binding affinities by calculating their binding free energies. Three hits showed ligand-protein stability in MD simulations, maintained essential interactions, and showed lower binding free energies than the reference compound, indicating they may be more potent BLT1 antagonists. The three identified candidates have unique scaffolds and show potential as potent and selective BLT1 antagonists. These findings pave the way for future experimental evaluation to advance these compounds as anti-inflammatory agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.