ArticleScientific reports2025
In silico functional, structural, and pathogenicity assessment of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human SOX9 gene.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and characterization of 13 gene families encoding enzymes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in barley and their roles under abiotic stress.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- De novo transcriptome and tissue-specific gene expression analysis in three types of barley following exploring the mechanism of quercetin content in purple barley (Hordeum vulgare).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) play a crucial role in the genetic basis of various human diseases and have the potential to serve as valuable biomarkers for disease prediction and personalized treatment. SNPs alter the genetic sequence that produce muted gene and subsequently mutated gene encode altered amino acid residues that can produce the misfolded protein. The SRY-box transcription factor 9, also known as SOX9, is a key determinant for cell growth and has a significant impact on the development of breast cancer. The molecular mechanisms by which missense SNPs in SOX9 influence the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway and contribute to tumour development in SOX9 members remain poorly understood and require further elucidation. Therefore, various computational methods based on sequence and structure were employed to investigate how mutations affect the SOX9 protein. We identified 5,029 SNPs in the SOX9 gene, of which 1,158 were missense (23.03%), 494 were synonymous (9.82%), and 3,377 were intronic (67.15%). SIFT analysis predicted that nine mutations were deleterious. Seven of these missense SNPs (D85H, F154L, A158T, H165Y, K173E, D441N, and G457D) were found to be damaging, potentially harmful, effective, disease-related, and highly deleterious. A high-risk mutation D85H located within the SOX9 DNA-binding HMG box domain PF00505 suggests a potential role in disease causation. Further, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation revealed variations in RMSD and RMSF values, with higher rGyr and hydrogen bond counts in the mutant protein compared to the wild-type, indicating that the mutation might alter protein structure and stability. Finally, PCA, DCCM, and FEL analyses of SOX9 apo protein and mutated D85H provided detailed insights into primary movements, internal motions, energy landscapes, and structural flexibility. Overall, these findings highlight pathways for further investigation into how missense SNPs in the SOX9 gene modify protein structure and function, potentially aiding in strategies to mitigate the negative consequences of these mutations in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.