ArticleScientific reports2025
Sexual health and gender perspective among female physicians: a cross-sectional analytic study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Work-Related Quality of Life, Mental Health, and Female Sexual Well-Being Among Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual health is considered to be an integral component of overall well-being by the World Health Organization, yet this domain is often overlooked in female physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the sexual health of female physicians and examine how gender perceptions and gender role attitudes are associated with sexual functioning. This cross-sectional analytic study included 348 female physicians recruited through a closed professional all-female social media group used for communication, support, and professional interaction. Participants completed an online sociodemographic questionnaire, the gender perception scale (GPS), the gender roles attitude scale (GRAS), and the female sexual function index (FSFI). Pearson correlation, independent-samples t tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. Participants had a mean age of 37.04 ± 6.59 years. Among sexually active women (n = 315), the median intercourse frequency was 4 (IQR 4–8) times per month. Higher GPS scores were significantly associated with non-smoking status (P = .001), active employment (P < .05), and older age (r = .162, P = .003). Higher FSFI total scores were associated with being married (P = .012), having a non-smoking spouse (P = .008), having ≥ 2 pregnancies (P = .021), using contraception (P = .030), and higher intercourse frequency (r = .281, P < .001). A positive correlation was found between the FSFI desire subscale and the GRAS traditional gender role subscale (r = .118, P = .032), while the FSFI satisfaction subscale showed a negative correlation with the GRAS male gender role subscale (r = − .129, P = .018). Although female physicians have health knowledge and access to healthcare, which gives them an advantage, three out of four were at high risk of sexual dysfunction, according to FSFI scores. Compared with previous reports in national, population-based studies, female physicians demonstrated more egalitarian gender perceptions, although their attitudes towards gender roles remained somewhat traditional. Their traditional gender roles were found to significantly impact sexual desire and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.