Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381733›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2026

Integrating endogenous TurboID and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry for in vivo proximity labeling.

David S Fay, Boopathi Balasubramaniam, Sean M Harrington, Philip T Edeen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. TheMolecular biology of the cell · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David S Fay *Department of Molecular Biology, College of Agriculture, Life Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, USA. davidfay@uwyo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-4017
Boopathi Balasubramaniam *Department of Molecular Biology, College of Agriculture, Life Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-7873
Sean M HarringtonDepartment of Molecular Biology, College of Agriculture, Life Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, USA.
Philip T EdeenDepartment of Molecular Biology, College of Agriculture, Life Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Laramie, WY, USA.

Funding

Wyoming INBRE Phase 4- Equipment Supplement for x-ray diffractometer for Center for Advanced Scientific InstrumentationP20GM103432 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI Nicolas A. Blouin · 2012 to 2026
$56.8M
Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
In vivo regulation of the extracellular matrixR35GM136236 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI David S Fay · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103432NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136236NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proximity labeling has emerged as a powerful approach for identifying protein-protein interaction networks within living systems, particularly those involving weak or transient associations. Here, we present a comprehensive revised proximity labeling workflow, integrating TurboID labeling of endogenously expressed fusion proteins and data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry (MS). We benchmark this pipeline with a study of five conserved Caenorhabditis elegans proteins-NEKL-2, NEKL-3, MLT-2, MLT-3, and MLT-4- that form two NEKL-MLT kinase-scaffold subcomplexes involved in membrane trafficking and actin regulation. Profiling of NEKL-MLT interactomes across 23 experiments validated our approach through the identification of known NEKL-MLT binding partners and conserved nekl-mlt genetic interactors, including the discovery of several novel functional interactors. Importantly, inclusion of methodological variations, stringent controls, and filtering strategies enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility, defining a set of intuitive quantitative metrics for routine assessment of experimental quality. We show that DIA-based interactome workflows produce physiologically relevant findings, even in the presence of experimental noise and variability across biological replicates. Our study underscores the utility of DIA mass spectrometry in proximity labeling applications and highlights the value of incorporating internal controls, quantitative metrics, and biological validation to enhance confidence in candidate interactors.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsMass SpectrometryProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsProtein Interaction MapsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsC. elegansNIMA-related KinasesProximity LabelingTurboID

Identifiers

PMID41381733
PMCPMC12811337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.