ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026
In vivo multimodal neurochemical interfaces for real-time decoding of brain circuit.
Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional microelectrode arrays forBiomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors for traumatic brain injury biomarker detection: a review of analytical performance, machine learning integration, clinical validation, and point-of-care translation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurochemical signalling has emerged as a rapid, versatile and indispensable layer of neural computation, operating alongside electrical activity to shape circuit dynamics, behaviour and disease progression. Decoding these signals in vivo requires sensing platforms that combine spatiotemporal resolution, molecular specificity and anatomical compatibility, capabilities beyond those of traditional sampling methods. Electrochemical technologies, from fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to molecular recognition sensors, deliver subsecond temporal resolution without genetic manipulation, whereas optical approaches using genetically encoded indicators achieve cell-specific measurements with high spatial precision. However, most existing implementations provide only a single sensing function, restricting measurements to a passive chemical dimension and limiting comprehensive or causal circuit analysis. Hybrid systems begin to bridge this gap by coupling stimulation and sensing within unified interfaces, enabling richer interrogation of brain networks. Building on this foundation, transformative multimodal platforms fundamentally expand the boundaries of chemical sensing, overcoming limitations in scope, resolution and accessibility, to enable brain-wide, multianalyte and remote operation. In doing so, they elevate in vivo neurochemical sensing to a frontier discipline, offering unprecedented opportunities to map, decode and therapeutically modulate the chemical logic that underlies cognition, behaviour and pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41381720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.