Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381720›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

In vivo multimodal neurochemical interfaces for real-time decoding of brain circuit.

Yeji Kim, Seongjun Park

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Three-dimensional microelectrode arrays forBiomedical engineering letters · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yeji KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5423-5994
Seongjun ParkSchool of Transdisciplinary Innovations, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. seongjunpark@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-9628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurochemical signalling has emerged as a rapid, versatile and indispensable layer of neural computation, operating alongside electrical activity to shape circuit dynamics, behaviour and disease progression. Decoding these signals in vivo requires sensing platforms that combine spatiotemporal resolution, molecular specificity and anatomical compatibility, capabilities beyond those of traditional sampling methods. Electrochemical technologies, from fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to molecular recognition sensors, deliver subsecond temporal resolution without genetic manipulation, whereas optical approaches using genetically encoded indicators achieve cell-specific measurements with high spatial precision. However, most existing implementations provide only a single sensing function, restricting measurements to a passive chemical dimension and limiting comprehensive or causal circuit analysis. Hybrid systems begin to bridge this gap by coupling stimulation and sensing within unified interfaces, enabling richer interrogation of brain networks. Building on this foundation, transformative multimodal platforms fundamentally expand the boundaries of chemical sensing, overcoming limitations in scope, resolution and accessibility, to enable brain-wide, multianalyte and remote operation. In doing so, they elevate in vivo neurochemical sensing to a frontier discipline, offering unprecedented opportunities to map, decode and therapeutically modulate the chemical logic that underlies cognition, behaviour and pathology.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.