ArticleScientific reports2025
Channel-spatial attention modules in convolutional neural networks for image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many studies have established that the attention mechanism has great potential in improving the performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in image classification problems in recent years. Combining channel and spatial attention modules is one of the different kinds of attention mechanisms that are inspired by the visual perception of the human brain. So far, no paper has considered both parallel and sequential states of combining channel-spatial attention modules, so that while comparing them comprehensively and accurately, it can be definitively said which of them is more optimal in terms of a better balance between efficiency and computational complexity of the model. In this paper, we introduced two new types of channel-spatial attention modules, the Parallel Channel-spatial Attention Module (PCSAM) and the Sequential Channel-spatial Attention Module (SCSAM), to embed in the architecture of any CNN. Each of the proposed attention modules is composed of a channel and spatial attention sub-modules. The Channel Attention Module (CAM) and Spatial Attention Module (SAM) help the network in extracting the channels related to the architecture of the Region of Interest (RoI) and its location in the input feature maps, respectively. We increase the representation power of the attention-based networks by extracting the features using Global Average Pooling (GAP) and Global Maximum Pooling (GMP) in the CAM and SAM. Also, the Dilation Convolution (DC) layer is employed in the structure of the SAM instead of the standard convolution to better focus on the RoI in the feature maps. The PCSAM and SCSAM are implemented in the architecture of the ResNet18 and MobileNetv4 to produce the ResNet18PCSAM, ResNet18SCSAM, MobileNetv4PCSAM, and MobileNetv4SCSAM. All networks are trained and evaluated on three general image classification datasets, the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet, with the same experimental conditions for 50 epochs. The classification results in the test step show that the MobileNetv4SCSAM has a better efficiency than other architectures on all datasets. It also achieved higher performance than the previous existing channel-spatial attention modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.