ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-temporal scale framework for comprehensive quantification and attribution of anthropogenic impacts on runoff.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attribution analysis of runoff variation holds significant importance for water resource conservation and management. This study established a methodological framework for runoff reconstruction, quantification, and analysis of contribution rates. The framework comprises four core components: (1) Aggregation of hydro-meteorological variables across multiple time scales, thereby identifying the most representative temporal scale for a given river basin, effectively overcoming the limitation of single-scale approaches common in previous research. (2) Optimization of explanatory variables specific to each temporal scale by integrating Spearman correlation and variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis, effectively addressing multicollinearity issues often overlooked in previous studies. (3) Reconstruction of runoff using Random Forest Regression Model (RFRM) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), with multi-metric validation metrics, to ensure transferability across diverse river basins. (4) Across multiple temporal scales, the integration of remote sensing and statistical data to identify anthropogenic drivers addresses the limitations of single-factor attribution analysis. Tested in the Lan River Basin, the framework identified precipitation as the dominant meteorological driver (Spearman's p = 0.90 at the seasonal scale), determined monthly and bimonthly scales as optimal for modeling, and revealed the complementary strengths of RFRM and SWAT-the latter excelling particularly in simulating high-flow extremes. Integration of multi-source data further elucidated the dual role of human activities on runoff, underscoring the value of quantitative attribution. These findings offer methodological guidance for temporal scale and model selection while providing a transferable approach for runoff attribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.