ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of forward shoulder elevation on spinal excursion at three different speeds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how varying shoulder movement speeds affect spinal mobility to enhance understanding of the trunk's adaptive response to these perturbations. Eleven healthy participants were fitted with motion markers placed on the bilateral shoulders, upper extremities, and the spinous processes of the 8th thoracic vertebra (T8), 4th lumbar vertebra (L4), and the posterior superior iliac spine, representing the 2nd sacral vertebra (S2). Each participant performed bilateral forward shoulder elevation in the sagittal plane at three different speeds (natural, fast, and slow) in a randomized order. Each speed condition included five repetitions, with the middle three repetitions used for analysis. The peak-to-peak displacement and excursion of T8, L4, and S2 during the ascending and descending phases of shoulder elevation were recorded. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Friedman test were applied to compare the effects of the three speeds. Significant differences were observed between the fast and slow speeds in the peak-to-peak displacements of T8 and L4 during the descending phase, as well as in the T8 excursion across the full range of forward shoulder elevation, or 31%, 24%, and 26% increase, with p-values of 0.045 (ES = 1.053), 0.042 (ES = 1.019), and 0.028 (ES = 1.174), respectively. No significant differences were detected at the S2 level. Spinal mobility during forward shoulder elevation was observed at fast speed, especially during the descending phase at the thoracic and lumbar levels. These speed-dependent changes are clinically critical, influencing movement control and trunk injury risk, especially during descent of forward shoulder elevation. The speed of shoulder movement should be considered during physical examination and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.