Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of forward shoulder elevation on spinal excursion at three different speeds.

Pichaya Hengsomboon, Ninwisan Hengsomboon, Pavinee Harutaichun, Sunee Bovonsunthonchai, Prasert Sakulsriprasert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pichaya HengsomboonMusculoskeletal Physical Therapy Research, Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Ninwisan HengsomboonMusculoskeletal Physical Therapy Research, Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Pavinee HarutaichunMusculoskeletal Physical Therapy Research, Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Sunee BovonsunthonchaiGait and Balance, Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Prasert SakulsriprasertMusculoskeletal Physical Therapy Research, Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. prasert.sak@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how varying shoulder movement speeds affect spinal mobility to enhance understanding of the trunk's adaptive response to these perturbations. Eleven healthy participants were fitted with motion markers placed on the bilateral shoulders, upper extremities, and the spinous processes of the 8th thoracic vertebra (T8), 4th lumbar vertebra (L4), and the posterior superior iliac spine, representing the 2nd sacral vertebra (S2). Each participant performed bilateral forward shoulder elevation in the sagittal plane at three different speeds (natural, fast, and slow) in a randomized order. Each speed condition included five repetitions, with the middle three repetitions used for analysis. The peak-to-peak displacement and excursion of T8, L4, and S2 during the ascending and descending phases of shoulder elevation were recorded. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Friedman test were applied to compare the effects of the three speeds. Significant differences were observed between the fast and slow speeds in the peak-to-peak displacements of T8 and L4 during the descending phase, as well as in the T8 excursion across the full range of forward shoulder elevation, or 31%, 24%, and 26% increase, with p-values of 0.045 (ES = 1.053), 0.042 (ES = 1.019), and 0.028 (ES = 1.174), respectively. No significant differences were detected at the S2 level. Spinal mobility during forward shoulder elevation was observed at fast speed, especially during the descending phase at the thoracic and lumbar levels. These speed-dependent changes are clinically critical, influencing movement control and trunk injury risk, especially during descent of forward shoulder elevation. The speed of shoulder movement should be considered during physical examination and intervention.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularShoulderSpineAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMovementThoracic VertebraeYoung AdultLumbarMobilityMovementSpineThoracic

Identifiers

PMID41381673
PMCPMC12808743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.