Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A computationally efficient hybrid framework combining deep feature extraction and gradient boosting for early diagnosis of Olive leaf diseases.

Uğur Şevik, Fatih Serdar Aydemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uğur ŞevikDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Kanuni Campus, 61080, Ortahisar, Trabzon, Türkiye. usevik@ktu.edu.tr.
Fatih Serdar AydemirDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Kanuni Campus, 61080, Ortahisar, Trabzon, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olive production holds a significant position in the global agricultural trade. In addition to being influenced by seasonal climatic conditions, agricultural diseases are another factor that affects olive yield. Peacock spot disease and olive bud mites are the primary agricultural diseases affecting olive production. These two diseases cause specific lesions in the leaves of olive trees. It has been observed that artificial intelligence approaches such as deep learning and machine learning are used for early detection of such adverse conditions. However, the need for high computational processing in the classification and detection processes of deep learning models limits the accessibility of these algorithms to all businesses. To address this challenge, this study proposes a hybrid framework that combines the robust feature extraction capabilities of deep learning models with the computational efficiency of machine-learning classifiers. Specifically, this study analyzes the performance of this combined approach and compares the results with those of existing deep learning studies in the literature. As feature extraction deep learning models, MobileNetV2, DenseNet121, EfficientNetV2B0, and ConvNext Tiny were selected, while AdaBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Gradient Boosting algorithms from the Boosting family were included as classifiers. In the model training, a dataset consisting of 3,400 images of olive leaves belonging to three classes-healthy, olive_peack_spot, and aculus_olearius-was used. The experimental results showed that the DenseNet121 + XGBoost combination achieved a baseline accuracy of 92%. Following a data augmentation phase to enrich the training data, the model performance was significantly enhanced, reaching a final accuracy of 94% and a macro average F1-Score of 94%. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test revealed that the DenseNet121 + XGBoost combination statistically outperformed the second-best model (p < 0.05). This performance is attributed to the dense connectivity of DenseNet, which promotes effective feature reuse and improves gradient flow. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that a higher number of parameters does not always guarantee better performance; rather, architectural efficiency plays a crucial role in avoiding overfitting and ensuring model robustness, as evidenced by DenseNet121 outperforming the larger ConvNeXtTiny model.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOleaPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesAlgorithmsEarly DiagnosisMachine LearningHybrid classification modelMachine learningOlive leaf diseasesPlant disease detectionTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41381664
PMCPMC12808312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.