Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381662›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative morphometric and biosystematic analysis of Kyasanur forest disease vectors (Haemaphysalis Bispinosa and H. turturis) from South India.

Sahina Sidhik, B Esakkiammal, R Balasubramanian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sahina SidhikInstitut Pasteur du Cambodge (Pasteur Network), Phnom Penh, 120210, Cambodia. ssidhik@pasteur-kh.org.
B EsakkiammalSri Parasakthi College for Women, Courtallam, Tamil Nadu, 627802, India.
R BalasubramanianICMR- National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India. balasniv@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haemaphysalis ticks are significant vectors of multiple pathogens and pose substantial threats to both public and veterinary health. Among them, H. bispinosa and H. turturis are important vectors of Kyasanur Forest Disease Virus (KFDV) in South India. Although both species are well recognized, detailed comparative descriptions of their morphological and morphometric characteristics remain limited. This study aimed to expand the current understanding of these species by describing and quantifying morphological differences across all developmental stages (n = 15 per stage) through a combination of morphological, morphometric, and statistical approaches, using specimens collected from two geographically distinct populations in South India. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) provided high-resolution structural comparisons, while Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to assess morphometric variation and distinguish key diagnostic features. The results revealed clear interspecific differences, particularly in the scutum and idiosoma. Haemaphysalis bispinosa exhibited a broader basis capituli, while H. turturis displayed a wider and shorter body form, along with a distinct ventral spur morphology on the coxa III segment. These findings confirm that H. bispinosa and H. turturis are morphometrically distinct species and underscore the value of integrative morphological and statistical tools for resolving cryptic species complexes. This work contributes to the biosystematic understanding and accurate identification of medically important Haemaphysalis ticks in endemic regions.

Indexed as

Arachnid VectorsDisease VectorsIxodidaeKyasanur Forest DiseaseAnimalsFemaleIndiaMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPrincipal Component AnalysisCryptic speciesHaemaphysalis bispinosaHaemaphysalis turturisKyasanur forest disease virus (KFDV)Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)Tick morphology

Identifiers

PMID41381662
PMCPMC12698698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.