Observational studyScientific reports2025
Protocol to avoid post-dural puncture headache after large-volume cerebral spinal fluid extraction in a prospective observational memory clinic study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumbar puncture (LP) to extract cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) to quantify analytes relevant to brain health can lead to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Incidences vary across studies. This prospective memory clinic study assessed the incidence and intensity of PDPH after protocolised extraction and post-procedural rest. Patient and procedural risk factors for PDPH were explored. In 724 patients or healthy volunteers we performed 1147 procedures with intravenous infusion of 500 ml of 0.9% saline, LP with 22-gauge non-cutting pencil point needles, CSF collection (13.5-15 ml) without negative pressure, and observed bed and chair rest for 45 min. The overall incidence of PDPH was 9.6% at 24 h and 4.7% at seven days. All PDPHs were mild to moderate and self-limited (no blood patches or hospitalisations required). Patients managed symptoms with low doses of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, along with oral caffeine intake. At 24 h PDPH was significantly associated with a low (> 18.5-24.9) or very high (> 40) body mass index (P = 0.021), a history of chronic pain (P = 0.007), or a lower puncture site (P = 0.002). We conclude that protocolised extraction of large volumes of CSF with a medium-gauge non-traumatic needle, controlled fluid loading and short bed rest can lower the incidence of PDPH, favouring safe CSF research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.