Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381653›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Protocol to avoid post-dural puncture headache after large-volume cerebral spinal fluid extraction in a prospective observational memory clinic study.

Guillem Pérez-García, Lluis Gallart-Gallego, Olga Comps-Vicente, Luis Molto-García, Oriol Grau-Rivera, Sandra Pradas-Méndez, Anna Soteras-Prat, Antonio Montes-Pérez

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillem Pérez-GarcíaHospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5405-6893
Lluis Gallart-GallegoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Neurosciences Program, Barcelona, Spain. lgallart@hmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-2002
Olga Comps-VicentePain Clinic, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Neurosciences Program, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Molto-GarcíaPain Clinic, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Neurosciences Program, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol Grau-RiveraBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Centre, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4730-5341
Sandra Pradas-MéndezBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Centre-Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Soteras-PratBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Centre-Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-3430
Antonio Montes-PérezPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Universitat Pompeu i Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. amontes@hmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1346-697X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar puncture (LP) to extract cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) to quantify analytes relevant to brain health can lead to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Incidences vary across studies. This prospective memory clinic study assessed the incidence and intensity of PDPH after protocolised extraction and post-procedural rest. Patient and procedural risk factors for PDPH were explored. In 724 patients or healthy volunteers we performed 1147 procedures with intravenous infusion of 500 ml of 0.9% saline, LP with 22-gauge non-cutting pencil point needles, CSF collection (13.5-15 ml) without negative pressure, and observed bed and chair rest for 45 min. The overall incidence of PDPH was 9.6% at 24 h and 4.7% at seven days. All PDPHs were mild to moderate and self-limited (no blood patches or hospitalisations required). Patients managed symptoms with low doses of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, along with oral caffeine intake. At 24 h PDPH was significantly associated with a low (> 18.5-24.9) or very high (> 40) body mass index (P = 0.021), a history of chronic pain (P = 0.007), or a lower puncture site (P = 0.002). We conclude that protocolised extraction of large volumes of CSF with a medium-gauge non-traumatic needle, controlled fluid loading and short bed rest can lower the incidence of PDPH, favouring safe CSF research.

Indexed as

Post-Dural Puncture HeadacheSpinal PunctureAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsEpidural blood patchHeadacheLumbar puncturePost-dural puncture headache

Identifiers

PMID41381653
PMCPMC12804995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.