ArticleScientific reports2025
Attention-guided hybrid learning for accurate defect classification in manufacturing environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial defect classification remains a crucial challenge due to the visual complexity, rarity, and diversity of defect types encountered in manufacturing. In this paper, we present a hybrid deep learning framework that integrates YOLOv11 and EfficientNet-B7 to perform robust multi-class defect classification. Our model combines the semantic richness of YOLO's spatial features with the fine-grained representation power of EfficientNet, further enhanced by a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) and a lightweight Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) for attention-guided multi-scale refinement. Unlike conventional anomaly detectors or class-specific models, our framework supports unified classification across diverse object categories and defect types. We evaluate the proposed model on two datasets: the MVTec-FS benchmark, which includes 46 defect types across 14 industrial categories, and our proprietary Window dataset, which comprises three real-world defect classes under variable conditions. The model achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 91.90% on MVTec-FS and 96.13% on the Window dataset, outperforming existing CNN, transformer, and ensemble baselines. Ablation studies further demonstrate the incremental contribution of each module to the overall performance. These results validate our model's ability to generalize across domains and offer practical utility in industrial quality control pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.