ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of factors affecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and the establishment and validation of a predictive model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable weighted ensemble based on routinely collected clinical data for the accurate prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative total cholesterol and axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer: an exploratory analysis with a preliminary nomogram.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) is essential for optimizing surgical planning in breast cancer (BC). We retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data from 1,307 BC patients who underwent surgery at Tengzhou Central People's Hospital (January 2019-December 2023). Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n=914) and an internal validation set (n=393) in a 7:3 ratio. An independent external cohort (n=61) from Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital was used for external validation. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression followed by multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of ALNM. A nomogram was constructed from the final model. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated agreement and clinical utility. Four variables independently predicted ALNM: estrogen receptor (ER) status, suspicious axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound, suspicious axillary lymph nodes on CT, and tumor size. The nomogram achieved C-indices of 0.81 (training), 0.74 (internal validation), and 0.84 (external validation). AUCs were 0.81, 0.74, and 0.84, respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed risks, and DCA indicated net clinical benefit across relevant threshold probabilities. We developed and externally validated a practical, interpretable nomogram that predicts ALNM preoperatively using routinely available clinicopathologic and imaging variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.