ArticleScientific reports2025
Screen-printed flexible carbon electrodes for efficient neural impulse transmission.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents research on the electrical performance of carbon-based electrodes printed by screen printing technique. The electrodes are studied with respect to their potential application as conductors of neural impulses in the treatment of neural system disorders. Three types of carbon are considered, i.e. graphite, carbon black, and graphene. The electrodes of various dimensions were printed on thin Mylar-A PET foil from Micel Sp. z o.o., Poland. The electrical performance of the electrodes is verified on a single rectangular electrical impulse. The ability of each electrode to conduct the input impulse is reported. Also, the electrical properties are measured and correlated with the conductive characteristics. The results demonstrate that graphite- and carbon-black-based electrodes provide superior electrical signal transmission, whereas graphene electrodes underperform. This finding suggests directions for future research on neural printable interfaces using carbon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.