ArticleScientific reports2025
A multidimensional analysis of the 21
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, evaluating competencies such as knowledge, practical skills, character traits, and meta-learning capabilities has gained increasing importance in educational research. As educational datasets grow larger and more complex, machine learning offers promising tools for analyzing student responses and identifying patterns that support assessment processes. This study aims to classify student responses collected through the 21st Century Competencies Scale using a variety of machine learning algorithms, including SVM, ANN, k-NN, RF, LR, DT, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost. The dataset contains responses from 616 participants and covers four key sub-dimensions. Model performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Grid search optimization was also applied to improve performance. The highest classification accuracy was achieved by LR in the "Character" sub-dimension (78.73%), followed by SVM in the "Skills" (78.58%) and overall scale (74.51%). Gradient Boosting and k-NN models also showed competitive results across multiple dimensions. These findings emphasize the effectiveness of machine learning, particularly when combined with parameter optimization, in supporting data-driven educational assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.