ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk prediction model for neonatal mortality among neonates hospitalized with sepsis, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Culture-Confirmed Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal sepsis is a significant public health challenge across the globe, particularly, in low-resource settings. While early identification of at-risk patients is a recommended approach to reduce sepsis- related deaths, there is limited evidence from low-resource settings. Therefore, this study aimed to develop prediction models to estimate neonatal mortality among neonates with sepsis. The study was conducted among 975 neonates diagnosed with sepsis in the NICUs of two large hospitals in Bahir Dar city. Data were analyzed in R software, and regression analyses were performed. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration plot were used to assess model performance, and internal validation was performed using bootstrapping technique. Sepsis accounted for 27.9% of neonatal deaths. Key predictors of mortality were low birth weight, late initiation of breastfeeding, gestational age, fifth-minute Apgar score, tachycardia, respiratory distress, and convulsions. The original and nomogram models demonstrated an AUC of 81.3% and 81.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the high incidence of sepsis-attributed mortality highlights the need for effective predictive tools. The nomogram, based on key clinical predictors such as low birth weight, late initiation of breastfeeding, prematurity, fifth-minute apgar score, tachycardia, respiratory distress, and convulsions, demonstrated very good discrimination, and calibration performances, These findings support the use of the model as a practical tool for early risk stratification and clinical decision-making in neonatal intensive care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.