ArticleScientific reports2025
Decisional conflict among Chinese family caregivers prior to ECMO initiation: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy for critically ill patients often requires complex and high-stakes decision-making by family members, who are frequently unprepared for such situations. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of decisional conflict among Chinese family caregivers prior to ECMO initiation and to examine associated biopsychosocial factors. A convenience sample of 169 family members of patients for whom ECMO initiation was deemed necessary by the treating team was recruited from a tertiary hospital in Jiangxi Province, China. Data were collected using validated instruments, including the Decisional Conflict Scale, Decision Preparedness Scale, Decision Fatigue Scale, Social Support Scale, and Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with decisional conflict. Decisional conflict was reported by 63.3% of participants. In univariate analyses, conflict was associated with family income, understanding of the patient’s condition and ECMO, decision fatigue, decision preparedness, physician trust, and social support (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analyses, higher decision fatigue was associated with greater decisional conflict (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.00–2.06). Lower understanding of ECMO (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.06–0.58), lower physician trust scores (indicating higher trust; OR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.51–6.57), and lower social support (OR = 0.443, 95% CI 0.280–0.70) were significantly associated with increased decisional conflict. A substantial proportion of Chinese family caregivers of ECMO patients experience decisional conflict prior to treatment initiation. Clinical practice must uphold the ethical obligation of providing complete and comprehensible information to patients or surrogates. Beyond this baseline, structured communication strategies (e.g., family meetings, standardized ECMO information sheets) and decision-support tools may help families understand patients’ presumed wishes and reduce decisional conflict under time-pressured ICU conditions. Where feasible, interventions to alleviate decision fatigue, strengthen physician–family trust, and reinforce available social support resources may further support surrogate decision-making. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.