ArticleScientific data2025
A transcriptomic profiling across tissues, developmental stages, and types of Nicotiana tabacum.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A transcriptomic profiling across tissues, developmental stages, and types of Nicotiana tabacum.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nicotiana tabacum is one of the most important globally economic crops and also a model plant for studying secondary metabolism. N. tabacum is further classified into different types such as flue-cured, cigar, and sun-cured and so on, which produces distinct secondary profiles. However, the gene expression differences among types remains gaps. Here, we generated a large-scale transcriptomic profiling across tissues (root, stem, leaf and flower), developmental stages (rosette, vigorous growth, topping and harvest stage) and types (flue-cured and cigar type) of N. tabacum, resulting in a total of 72 high-quality datasets from 24 samples (three replicates per sample). The dataset by this study provides a valuable resource for researchers engaged in studying on plant secondary products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.