ArticleScientific data2025
Structured dataset of reported cloud seeding activities in the United States (2000-2025) using an LLM.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structured dataset of reported cloud seeding activities in the United States (2000-2025) using an LLM.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cloud seeding, a weather modification technique used to increase precipitation, has been practiced in the western United States since the 1940s. However, comprehensive datasets are not currently available to analyze these efforts. To address this gap, we present a structured dataset of reported cloud seeding activities in the U.S. from 2000-2025, including the project name, year, season, state, operator, seeding agent, apparatus used for deployment, stated purpose, target area, control area, start date, and end date. Combining our multi-stage PDF-to-text extraction pipeline with OpenAI's o3 large language model (LLM), we processed 832 historical reports from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The resulting dataset demonstrates 98.38% estimated accuracy, based on manual review of 200 randomly sampled records, and is publicly available on Zenodo. This dataset addresses the gap in cloud seeding data and demonstrates the potential for LLMs to extract structured information from historical environmental documents. More broadly, this work provides a scalable framework for unlocking historical data from scanned documents across scientific domains.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.