Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel deep learning based spatial ensemble approach and segment anything model for landslide risk assessment in Chamoli district of Garhwal Himalayas.

Sayantan Mandal, Ashis Kumar Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sayantan MandalDepartment of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Ashis Kumar SahaDepartment of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110007, India. aksaha@geography.du.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims at introducing novel "Spatial Ensemble" approach for landslide risk assessment (LRA). For this purpose, the present work focuses on three different algorithms that includes a state-of-the-art deep learning DenseNet Neural Network, and 2 popular benchmark algorithms of MLPNN and XGBoost. The spatial ensemble approach in LRA focuses on generating two distinct types of "Landslide Impedance Composite Maps", where the first one predicts the broadest possible danger zones covering the maximum extent with potential landslide occurrences across the study area. The second map targets the places in all probability to encounter landslides, by demarcating specific locations with the greatest risk of landslide occurrences to prioritize accuracy and precision, making sure that areas with highest levels of risk receive detailed attention. The outcome of the second map has helped during field verification, leading to identification of a new landslide in close proximity of human settlements and buildings. It is a crucial finding as this study applies state-of-the-art auto-detection algorithm of Segment Anything Model (SAM) to detect buildings automatically in close proximity which is accurate and time-saving alternative to landslides, for risk assessment. And finally, a landslide risk zone is developed to delineate the building vulnerability around the landslide, which is validated against cracked buildings and presence of fault lines in the area. Thus, this research combines cutting-edge technologies with robust field observations, to introduce a novel and stepped approach of landslide risk assessment.

Indexed as

Deep learningJoshimathLandslide impendence mappingSegment anything model (SAM)Spatial ensemble

Identifiers

PMID41381540
PMCPMC12698865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.