ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel deep learning based spatial ensemble approach and segment anything model for landslide risk assessment in Chamoli district of Garhwal Himalayas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims at introducing novel "Spatial Ensemble" approach for landslide risk assessment (LRA). For this purpose, the present work focuses on three different algorithms that includes a state-of-the-art deep learning DenseNet Neural Network, and 2 popular benchmark algorithms of MLPNN and XGBoost. The spatial ensemble approach in LRA focuses on generating two distinct types of "Landslide Impedance Composite Maps", where the first one predicts the broadest possible danger zones covering the maximum extent with potential landslide occurrences across the study area. The second map targets the places in all probability to encounter landslides, by demarcating specific locations with the greatest risk of landslide occurrences to prioritize accuracy and precision, making sure that areas with highest levels of risk receive detailed attention. The outcome of the second map has helped during field verification, leading to identification of a new landslide in close proximity of human settlements and buildings. It is a crucial finding as this study applies state-of-the-art auto-detection algorithm of Segment Anything Model (SAM) to detect buildings automatically in close proximity which is accurate and time-saving alternative to landslides, for risk assessment. And finally, a landslide risk zone is developed to delineate the building vulnerability around the landslide, which is validated against cracked buildings and presence of fault lines in the area. Thus, this research combines cutting-edge technologies with robust field observations, to introduce a novel and stepped approach of landslide risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.