Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cooperative foraging between dolphins and fish-eating killer whales.

Sarah M E Fortune, Xi Cheng, Keith Holmes, Andrew W Trites

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah M E FortuneDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. sarah.fortune@dal.ca.
Xi ChengLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany.
Keith HolmesHakai Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Andrew W TritesMarine Mammal Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecies associations during foraging can range from competition to cooperation but are often complex and difficult to interpret. Using aerial drone and biologgers (n=9) equipped with video, acoustic and inertial sensors, we recorded interactions between fish-eating northern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) in the presence of adult Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). We observed frequent co-occurrence and coordinated movements, with the killer whales orienting towards the dolphins and following them to depth. We also recorded reduced echolocation and rolling movements by the killer whales in the presence of dolphins, suggesting that the whales may eavesdrop on dolphin echolocations to scan broader areas to locate large Chinook salmon-prey that are too big for the dolphins to capture and swallow whole. Captured fish were brought to the surface by the killer whales and broken apart for sharing with other matrilineally related pod members-while the accompanying dolphins scavenged scraps. No antagonistic interactions or avoidance behaviours were observed between the killer whales and dolphins. The spatially and temporally coordinated foraging behaviours we recorded suggest northern resident killer whales and dolphins opportunistically engage in cooperative foraging, which may improve the ability of killer whales to detect Chinook, while dolphins benefit by scavenging prey scraps-highlighting the need for further investigation into the ecological implications of these interspecific encounters.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDolphinsFeeding BehaviorPredatory BehaviorWhale, KillerAnimalsEcholocationFishes

Identifiers

PMID41381531
PMCPMC12698851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.