ArticleNature communications2025
Modular programming of interaction and geometric specificity enables assembly of complex DNA origami nanostructures.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonequilibrium Acceleration and Time Forecasting of Cluster-Mediated Self-Assembly.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- From toroids to helical tubules: Kirigami-inspired programmable assembly of two-periodic curved crystals from DNA origami.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Inverse Thermodynamics: Designing Interactions for Targeted Phase Behavior.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Economical and Versatile Subunit Design Principles for Self-Assembled DNA Origami Structures.ACS nano · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-assembly of nanoscale building blocks with programmable geometries and interactions offers a powerful route to engineer materials that mimic the complexity of biological structures. DNA origami provides an exceptional platform for this purpose, enabling precise control over subunit shape, binding angles, and interaction specificity. Here we present a modular DNA origami design approach to address the challenges of assembling geometrically complex nanoscale structures, including those with nonuniform curvatures. This approach features a core structure that completely conserves the scaffold routing across different designs and preserves more than 70% of the DNA staples between designs, dramatically reducing both cost and effort, while enabling precise and independent programming of subunit interactions and binding angles through adjustable overhang lengths and sequences. Using cryogenic electron microscopy, gel electrophoresis, and coarse-grained simulations, we validate a set of robust design rules and demonstrate the assembly of diverse self-limiting structures, including anisotropic shells, a T = 13 icosahedral shell, and a toroid with globally varying curvature. This modular strategy provides an efficient and cost-effective framework for the synthetic fabrication of complex nanostructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.