Trial reportNature communications2025
Biologically-informed integration of drug representations for breast cancer treatment using deep learning.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologically-informed integration of drug representations for breast cancer treatment using deep learning.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- TF-GateNet: An Interpretable and Biologically Guided Framework for Primary-Metastatic State Prediction from Somatic Genomic Alterations.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a cuproptosis-related lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of TCGA data.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 50% of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy do not achieve pathological complete response (pCR). Identifying personalized optimal therapeutic strategy is an unmet major challenge. Here, based on 4371 eligible patients from 31 datasets, we develop GDnet, an interpretable deep learning model integrating drug representations and tumor transcriptome profiles to predict the responses to neoadjuvant therapies and aid in selecting optimal treatment strategy. We demonstrate that GDnet significantly outperforms transcriptome-only model in predicting treatment response. Then we conduct two series of in-silico simulated clinical trials based on I-SPY2 trial and test datasets respectively and show that GDnet can significantly increase the pCR rate in all trials. Moreover, the odds ratios for pCR increase from 1.6 to 2.5 linearly as optimization intensifies. Overall, GDnet can function as a digital drug-testing surrogate to optimize treatment decision-making. This approach may have broader applications across various treatment settings and cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.