ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Calibrated Uncertainty Estimation for Soil Organic Carbon from Raman Spectra.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is a powerful tool for inferring chemometric properties from Raman spectra, expanding the information extractable from high-dimensional spectral data. A growing application is the estimation of soil organic carbon (SOC), where ML models relate overlapping Raman and fluorescence features to chemical composition. However, these models typically lack calibrated, prediction-level uncertainty estimates that limit their utility in decision-critical contexts. We present a framework for quantifying predictive uncertainty in SOC estimation from Raman spectra using Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS). The approach employs conformal prediction (CP) to generate statistically valid prediction intervals using a held-out calibration data set and is compatible with a variety of uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. To our knowledge, this is the first unified framework that integrates conformal calibration with multiple UQ strategies for Raman-based SOC estimation, addressing both aleatoric (irreducible) and epistemic (reducible) sources of uncertainty in a field-relevant setting. We assess the framework across several regression models, including Deep Ensembles, Bayesian neural networks, Monte Carlo Dropout, quantile regression, and heteroscedastic Gaussian models. All methods, when conformalized, produced well-calibrated uncertainty estimates with narrow prediction intervals, achieving reliable empirical coverage across confidence levels. Ablation studies revealed that many UQ techniques were poorly calibrated without conformalization. Our findings indicate that uncertainty in this task is predominantly aleatoric in nature, suggesting that improvements in predictive performance will depend more on improving spectral quality and preprocessing than on model complexity. This framework provides a practical, generalizable solution for generating trustworthy, calibrated, sample-specific uncertainty estimates in Raman-based chemometric analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.