ArticlePrimary care diabetes2026
The U.S. diabetes belt and factors explaining the excess risk: Multifactorial modeling and machine learning analysis.
Article in Primary care diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimResearch on the epidemiology of diabetes mellitus (DM) has identified a geographically distinct region in the United States (U.S.) known as the diabetes belt (DM Belt), which represents a significant public health concern. This study aimed to examine the factors contributing to the increased risk of DM in the DM Belt compared to the non-DM Belt.
methodsData were analyzed from 398,243 adults aged ≥ 18 years who participated in the 2019 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System. DM status was based on participants' self-reported physician-diagnosed DM. The DM Belt was defined at the state level according to the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention's classification. Logistic regression (LR) was used to estimate odds ratios for DM and assess the excess DM risk in the DM Belt versus the non-DM Belt. Random Forest (RF) and stepwise LR were employed to identify and rank key contributors to the excess DM risk.
resultsResidents of the DM Belt had a significantly higher prevalence of DM than those in the non-DM Belt (age-sex-adjusted rate: 12.5 % versus 10.5 %, p < 0.001). Low socioeconomic status (SES), physical inactivity, and hypertension were identified as the top three factors explaining the excess DM risk in the DM Belt.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of an integrated approach to improving SES, promoting healthy behaviors, managing chronic conditions for reducing DM risk. Addressing these factors can help mitigate health disparities in DM risk across the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.