ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
A comprehensive review of dynamic anterior stabilization of the long head of the biceps.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHB) is an arthroscopic option for recurrent anterior shoulder instability, especially with subcritical glenoid bone loss. This narrative review synthesizes biomechanical, technical, and clinical literature from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane (2014-2025), and Google Scholar. LHB-based DAS augments an arthroscopic Bankart repair by transferring the patient's LHB to the anterior glenoid, creating a dynamic "hammock-sling-bumper" effect that resists anterior translation in vulnerable positions. Contemporary techniques use minimally morbid arthroscopy with onlay or inlay fixation. Clinical series report low recurrence (0%-13%) at 1-5 years. Functional outcomes improve substantially: Rowe scores typically rise from 21-36 preoperatively to 90-95 postoperatively, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores exceed 90, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index improves by roughly 959 points. Return-to-sport rates reach 85%-95%, with range of motion generally comparable to standard Bankart repairs. In patients with subcritical bone loss (10%-20% of glenoid width), DAS appears to enhance stability versus isolated soft-tissue repair while avoiding the complication profile of bone-block procedures (e.g., Latarjet). Suggested indications include recurrent instability with subcritical bone loss, failed prior soft-tissue repair, young high-demand athletes, and concomitant superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions. Contraindications and optimal thresholds for bone loss require clarification. Evidence remains limited by nonrandomized designs and short follow-up. Long-term outcomes beyond five years and high-quality comparative or randomized trials are needed to define durability, refine indications, and position LHB-based DAS within the broader algorithm for anterior shoulder instability management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.