ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
Concomitant subscapularis tendon repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and assessment of superior migration of reattachment: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcomitant repair of the subscapularis (SSC) tendon in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with a lateralized design remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of SSC repair (repair at native insertion, repair at superiorly migrated position, and no repair) on the glenohumeral arc of motion following RTSA in a cadaveric biomechanical setting.
methodsRTSA was performed on eight cadaveric shoulders under six testing conditions as follows: unrepaired SSC/intact teres minor (TM); intact SSC/intact TM; superiorly repaired SSC/intact TM; unrepaired SSC/deficient TM; intact SSC/deficient TM; and superiorly repaired SSC/deficient TM. Increasing load (2.5-N increments) was applied to the middle deltoid (anterior, posterior; 10 N each, middle; 10- 20 N). The resulting abduction and rotation positions were measured.
resultsUnrepaired SSC demonstrated greater abduction and reduced internal rotation (IR), whereas SSC repair increased IR, particularly in TM-deficient models. Superiorly repaired SSC had higher glenohumeral abduction and IR than original SSC repair. SSC repair caused excessive IR in the TM deficiency seen with massive rotator cuff tears.
conclusionsConcomitant SSC repair in lateralized RTSA decreased glenohumeral abduction and increased IR. Concomitant SSC repair at the original and superiorly migrated footprints should be carefully considered following lateralized RTSA. Level of evidence: V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.