ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2026
Prevalence and Molecular Epidemiology of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria has close relationships among humans, animals, and the environment, necessitating the implementation of the "One Health" approach. In previous study, the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Methods: A total of 6,288 non-duplicated samples were collected from pig farms, slaughterhouses, and their personnel from three provinces in Korea between 2020 and 2022. Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL gene characterization were performed on the samples. Results: Overall, 1,084 ESBL-EC isolates were collected, with positivity detection rates of 24.7%, 23.3%, 12.7%, 3.9%, 17.2% in pigs, workers, the environment, meat, and total samples, respectively. Common ESBL types were Conclusions: The findings highlight the significance of elucidating AMR networks among humans, animals, and the environment. Prudent antimicrobial usage and continuous AMR monitoring in the pig industry are crucial to safeguard food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.