Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41381079›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental pediatrics2026

Ingestion of foreign bodies and caustic substances in children: a narrative review on clinical evaluation and management update.

Maria Rogalidou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria RogalidouDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, First Department of Paediatrics National and Kapodistrian University of Athens 'Aghia Sophia' Children's Hospitall, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ingestion of foreign bodies and caustic substances represents a significant clinical concern in pediatric populations, particularly among children aged 1-5 years. These events can result in a wide spectrum of complications ranging from acute, life-threatening emergencies to delayed sequelae with long-term morbidities. The severity and clinical course are influenced by multiple factors, including ingested material's nature, size, shape, and chemical composition, as well as its anatomical location, particularly when esophageal impaction occurs. High-risk foreign bodies- such as button batteries, high-powered magnets, sharp objects, superabsorbent polymers, and items containing toxic substances-pose an elevated risk of rapid tissue injury or perforation. Similarly, the ingestion of caustic agents, whether acidic or alkaline, carries the potential for extensive mucosal damage, with the degree of injury dictated by the pH, volume ingested, and inherent toxicity. Clinical management requires a highly individualized, case-by-case approach guided by the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and endoscopic evaluation findings. Endoscopy plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic assessment of mucosal injury and is a therapeutic modality for foreign body retrieval. Timely endoscopic interventions are strongly associated with improved outcomes and reduced complication rates. A high index of clinical suspicion remains critical to ensuring early diagnosis, prompt intervention, and the prevention of both acute and long-term complications, including strictures, perforations, and impaired quality of life. Comprehensive, multidisciplinary management is essential for optimizing patient outcomes in these potentially complex clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Caustic substancesChildEndoscopyForeign bodiesGastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID41381079
PMCPMC12790899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.