ArticleEpidemiology and health2025
Misattribution of Korea's malaria elimination status in 1979.
Article in Epidemiology and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to trace the origin and propagation of the common but incorrect belief that the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Republic of Korea (ROK) malaria-free in 1979. We conducted a source-based historical review of WHO Weekly Epidemiological Record (WER), regional reports from WHO's Western Pacific Regional Office (WPRO), United States Department of Defense (DoD) health reports, and scholarly and web-based citations. WHO WER 1981 identified the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) as one of the countries that had eliminated malaria by 1979. WHO/WPRO, to which ROK belongs, reported that malaria had not been eliminated in ROK as of 1980. Misinterpretations within United States. DoD documents incorrectly attributed this certification to ROK, resulting in widespread citation errors across academic literature and online sources. The misattribution of DPRK's elimination status to ROK derives from a misreading of WHO records and has persisted for decades through repeated, unverified citations. Strengthening source accuracy and citation practices is essential for ensuring reliability in global health reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.