Trial reportBlood advances2026
Venetoclax and ibrutinib induces durable clinical responses in marginal zone lymphoma.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02471391 (A Phase 2 Study of ABT-199 in Combination With Ibrutinib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Study of ABT-199 in Combination With Ibrutinib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (AIM Study)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractOral ibrutinib and venetoclax (I+V) demonstrate activity as monotherapy in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), with low complete response (CR) rates. I+V has shown good clinical activity with acceptable tolerability in other malignancies. We conducted a single-site, phase 2 trial of daily I+V in patients with MZL. Ibrutinib commenced at 560 mg daily; after 4 weeks, venetoclax commenced with weekly dose escalation to 400 mg daily. Combination therapy continued until disease progression or toxicity. The primary end point was week 16 CR. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Patients achieving eradication of MRD could enter elective treatment interruption (ETI). Fifteen patients with MZL were treated; 14 are included in efficacy analysis, and 15 were evaluable for safety. Overall response was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-95) by F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (CR rate, 43%; 95% CI, 18-71). By computed tomography, 16-week CR rate was 29% (95% CI, 8-58). Best response within 56 weeks was 57% CR (95% CI, 37-80), which is higher than historic ibrutinib-monotherapy control (3% CR; P< .001). MRD clearance at week 56 was 40%. Six MRD-negative CR patients entered ETI, with 4 remaining disease-free at a median of 4 years. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the whole cohort, the 5-year progression-free survival estimate was 56% (95% CI, 27-78). I+V is safe and effective for MZL, with higher CR than with ibrutinib. Durable, ongoing CR was observed in MRD-negative patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02471391.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.