Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41380113›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2026

Venetoclax and ibrutinib induces durable clinical responses in marginal zone lymphoma.

Sasanka M Handunnetti, Amit Khot, Piers Blombery, Kate Burbury, Philip A Thompson, David Ritchie, Rodney J Hicks, Glenda Burke, Rachel Koldej, Mathias Bressel and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02471391 (A Phase 2 Study of ABT-199 in Combination With Ibrutinib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02471391 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase 2 Study of ABT-199 in Combination With Ibrutinib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (AIM Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, AustraliaRan2015 to 2025Enrolled37ConditionsMantle Cell LymphomaArmsABT-199, Ibrutinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sasanka M HandunnettiDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8790-4675
Amit KhotDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-5373
Piers BlomberyDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-0022
Kate BurburyDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-681X
Philip A ThompsonDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2086-6031
David RitchieDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-6605
Rodney J HicksFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0758-0824
Glenda BurkeClinical Trials Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rachel KoldejFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1627-8934
Mathias BresselSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-9596
Juliana Di IulioCentre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David A WestermanDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen LadeDepartment of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-1343
Andrew W RobertsDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-5720
John F SeymourDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-6835
Constantine S TamDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9759-5017
Mary Ann AndersonDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-0215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractOral ibrutinib and venetoclax (I+V) demonstrate activity as monotherapy in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), with low complete response (CR) rates. I+V has shown good clinical activity with acceptable tolerability in other malignancies. We conducted a single-site, phase 2 trial of daily I+V in patients with MZL. Ibrutinib commenced at 560 mg daily; after 4 weeks, venetoclax commenced with weekly dose escalation to 400 mg daily. Combination therapy continued until disease progression or toxicity. The primary end point was week 16 CR. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Patients achieving eradication of MRD could enter elective treatment interruption (ETI). Fifteen patients with MZL were treated; 14 are included in efficacy analysis, and 15 were evaluable for safety. Overall response was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-95) by F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (CR rate, 43%; 95% CI, 18-71). By computed tomography, 16-week CR rate was 29% (95% CI, 8-58). Best response within 56 weeks was 57% CR (95% CI, 37-80), which is higher than historic ibrutinib-monotherapy control (3% CR; P< .001). MRD clearance at week 56 was 40%. Six MRD-negative CR patients entered ETI, with 4 remaining disease-free at a median of 4 years. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the whole cohort, the 5-year progression-free survival estimate was 56% (95% CI, 27-78). I+V is safe and effective for MZL, with higher CR than with ibrutinib. Durable, ongoing CR was observed in MRD-negative patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02471391.

Indexed as

AdenineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZonePiperidinesSulfonamidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualTreatment OutcomeAdenineBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicibrutinibPiperidinesSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID41380113
PMCPMC12964008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.