ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026
Genomically Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Is Not a Distinct Entity But a Collection of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance or Multiple Myeloma.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: the CAR-PRISM phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Integrated Genomic and Epigenomic Analysis Reveals Epigenetic Plasticity in Disease Progression and Multidrug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Teclistamab versus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) primarily relies on clinical features such as plasma cell involvement, immunoglobulin protein levels, and end-organ damage. However, as early intervention becomes a priority, the role of genomic features in differentiating risk is gaining attention.
methodsThis study analyzed next-generation sequencing data from 224 precursor condition samples with 51 patients having paired SMM and multiple myeloma (MM) and 1,779 samples from newly diagnosed MM to identify genomic features linked to progression in SMM and those with a low-risk nonprogressor precursor condition.
resultsOur findings from paired samples revealed no significant differences in somatic alterations and clonal structures between SMM and MM samples from the same patient. This indicates that plasma cells in progressor SMM are genomically pre-equipped with changes that define myeloma. Over 80% of driver mutations were present at both time points, and more than 66% of progressor samples showed only minor clonal changes. We further compared genomic changes between nonprogressor and progressor SMM. Nonprogressor plasma cells showed significantly lower mutational load and the absence of copy number alterations on chromosome 8. They reduced focal genomic loss compared with progressor plasma cells. A scoring system using genomic features predictively identified patients with low-risk SMM unlikely to progress, validated on 101 additional independent samples, and additive clinical value of genomic classification was further shown in combination with 20/2/20.
conclusionIn summary, the genomic distinctions now suggest that a proportion of SMMs with progressor phenotype are akin to MM, whereas nonprogressor SMM has monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance-like characteristics. The results should influence further investigation in larger studies to inform future diagnostic criteria and trial designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.