ArticlePain2026
The feasibility of a subgroup approach to create sensory-motor behavioral response profiles from a modified quantitative sensory test in cerebral palsy.
Article in Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractCerebral palsy is the most common motor disorder of childhood, leading to lifelong disability and associated comorbidities, including a high incidence of chronic pain. This hypothesis-generating study aimed to (1) investigate a modeling approach to subgrouping based on behavioral reactivity (BR) to a modified quantitative sensory test (mQST), and (2) explore potential relations between BR subgroups, pain status, and clinical features. For this cross-sectional study, recruitment was conducted through a systematic proportional stratified sampling approach in relation to cerebral palsy type (eg, spastic, mixed type). Caregivers completed the Dalhousie Pain Interview; health history was collected from the medical record. The mQST included 6 tactile stimuli applied to the back of the right and left calves (eg, light touch, pressure, heat), and the BR associated with each application was scored using a modified Face Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale. Of the 188 participants enrolled, 12 (6.4%) did not tolerate the full mQST. Latent class analysis was conducted with 172 participants, and the model with 6 classes had the best fit, with no classes having fewer than 5% of the sample. The 6-class solution revealed subgroups with relatively flat to relatively reactive patterns specific to different stimulus application modalities, providing sufficient evidence that reactivity subgroups can be reliably modeled. Descriptively, there were no apparent differences in the BR profile by sex; however, potentially by age and pain experience. Our results in this study indicate that sensory response profiles may be a promising approach to better understand the nature of chronic pain in cerebral palsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.