ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Language Differences by Race in the Narrative Section of the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiscrimination and bias based on race/ethnicity permeate the medical education system. Racial disparities in assessment measures can ultimately impact applicants' Match results. Few studies to date have examined the narrative portion of the emergency medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) for language differences by race. In this study we aimed to determine whether there were language differences by race in the narrative portion of the EM SLOE.
methodsThis study is an analysis of word category frequencies in the narrative portion of the SLOE for applicants applying to EM residency. The sample was drawn from the students who applied to the study institution in 2022. The narrative portion of the SLOE and other applicant factors were collected from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) applications and de-identified. We compared the number of SLOEs containing predefined keywords by race using chi2 analysis. Keywords were identified in six thematic word categories: agency; standout traits; ability; grindstone habits; achievement; and compassion. We performed logistic regression to determine whether any differences remained after controlling for other factors in the application.
resultsOf 1,104 applicants to the institution, 2,288 SLOEs with self-identified race/ethnicity were available for analysis. Black and Hispanic applicants had higher proportions of SLOEs that contained a compassion word than White applicants (24.9% and 22.4% vs 16.9%, respectively). This finding persisted after controlling for other factors in the application for Black applicants (odds ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.36]). There was no evidence of difference in word use by race across other thematic categories.
conclusionWe found differences in the proportion of SLOEs containing compassion words in the narrative portion of the EM SLOE between Black and White applicants, with Black applicants being described with compassion language more frequently. However, we found no difference in any other word category, indicating less overall disparity than other narrative assessment studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.