ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Reward-driven adaptation of movements requires strong recurrent basal ganglia-cortical loops.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The basal ganglia (BG) are a collection of subcortical nuclei involved in motor control, sensorimotor integration, and procedural learning. They play a key role in the acquisition and adaptation of movements, a process driven by dopamine-dependent plasticity at cortico-striatal projections, which serve as BG input. However, BG output is not necessary for executing many well-learned movements. This raises a fundamental question: How can plasticity at BG input contribute to the acquisition and adaptation of movements which execution does not require BG output? Existing models of BG function often neglect the feedback dynamics within cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical circuitry and do not capture the interaction between the cortex and BG in movement generation and adaptation. In this work, we address the above question in a theoretical model of the BG-thalamo-cortical multiregional network, incorporating anatomical, physiological, and behavioral evidence. We examine how its dynamics influence the execution and reward-based adaptation of reaching movements. We demonstrate how the BG-thalamo-cortical network can shape cortical motor output through the combination of three mechanisms: i) the diverse dynamics emerging from its closed-loop architecture, ii) attractor dynamics driven by recurrent cortical connections, and iii) reinforcement learning via dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity. Our study highlights the role of the cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical feedback in efficient visuomotor adaptation. It also suggests a mechanism for early-stage acquisition of reaching movements through motor babbling. More generally, our model explains how the BG-cortical network refines motor output through its intricate closed-loop dynamics and dopamine-dependent plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.